BEFORE I BEGIN
I will be participating in a panel for ConTessa, the free online gaming convention by women for everyone. That runs this weekend, and if you
haven’t checked it out yet, go and look here. The panel is called “Collaborative World-Building and Gaming.” Here’s the blurb:
Harness the power of the group to make better games. Collaborative gaming doesn’t necessarily mean a GM giving up power. Instead it can serve as a tool to draw players in, create novel settings, and provide engaging experiences. The panel will discuss ideas and practical applications. We’re excited to announced our scheduled participants: Meguey Baker (A Thousand and One Nights: A Game of Enticing Stories, Psi*Run), Brad Murray (Diaspora, Hollowpoint), and Ben Robbins (Microscope, Kingdom).
I’m there purely as the voice of a GM who has moved to more
of these shared-world technqiues over the last several years. The panel takes
place this Saturday at 2PM. It will be recorded as a YouTube video, so you’ll
have a chance to check it out after the fact.
SCHEDULES
This week’s an odd one for me. For my tabletop campaigns, I
run on alternate weeks. For online, I run weekly. This normally would be my
heavy week- running Sunday, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. But of the
middle three, two have been bumped due to player schedule conflicts and the
third is on break until mid-July. I’ll admit that I’m always a little thrown
when the schedule opens up like that. If I’m smart I’ll have planned some
things- like nights of painting minis or boardgaming. If not, I end up on the
PS3 or with some Steam Game I bought on sale but still haven’t really played.
 | |
| Late in the Fight: Pity the Dead |
OVERGAMER
I GM a lot. I’m primarily a gamemaster- when I do play I try
to only play in a single campaign at a time. Right now I’m in a fantasy game
using Mongoose’s Legend system. I’m
still trying to wrap my brain around the mechanics of that. It has been years (GURPS
3e) since I played a game with a roll-under mechanic instead of one aiming at #
of successes or beating target numbers. I was running six campaigns recently
until I finally wrapped up my f2f Changeling
the Lost campaign after a little over four years of play. The three of the
five ongoing campaigns are tabletop: Libri Vidicos, a magic steampunk school
game in a long running fantasy setting (begun Feb of ’07); Last Fleet, a
fantasy riff on Battlestar Galactica (started June of ’11); and New Dragons, an
L5R family campaign with homebrew rules (begun last November). I have two
online campaigns. Changeling Lost Vegas
which uses straight G+ Hangouts (begun last Dec and has a YouTube Playlist) and
First Wave Series Two, the second arc of a Mutants
& Masterminds 2e game using Roll20 & Skype (begun last June and has a wiki). I also have a wuxia campaign- White
Mountain, Black River- which is on hiatus but we will eventually
finish. Two of the f2f games- Libri
Vidicos and Last Fleet will wrap
this year- and First Wave will do one more series and then will finish.
DEFINE YOUR GAMING
Like many veteran gamemasters, I’ve run using many, many
systems. Too many. For those who see GMing as a calling, there’s a weird push
to get the perfect game- the game which does everything right. So we critique
when we read new games, we run something and then discard it in favor of
another game, we go back to old models, we tweak new ones. We hunt for the Holy
Grail even when we’re running campaigns that keep humming along. Dissatisfaction
rules. Or maybe that’s just me. So I’ve run V&V,
D&D, M&M, Champions, DC Heroes, James Bond 007, Vampire the Masquerade,
Mage the Ascension, Call of Cthulhu, Mutant City Blues, True20, Rolemaster
Classic, Rolemaster Standard System, GURPS, BRP, FATE, Ars Magica, Hollowpoint,
d20, Fading Suns, Dying Earth, AFMBE, Conspiracy X, Ghostbusters, Paranoia,
Hero System, MERP, Storyteller, Scion, Exalted, World of Darkness, Savage
Worlds, Armageddon, and blah, blah and more blah.
What I learned is that I prefer simple systems. At the same
time I want some chrome and some choice. I want that to be mostly on the player
side. I don’t mind complexity and variety in character creation, so long as
that doesn’t bog down or slow things when we get to actual play. So the powers,
abilities, feats, and everything like that should be easy for players to
remember and use. We shouldn’t have to go back to be book too much during the
session. I tend to strip off the rough corners and edges of the games I do
play. If you watch any of the YouTube videos of my Changeling sessions you can
see how I move through those things. I aim to reduce complexity- and funky edge
case rules often get dropped. Some of that’s my desire for speed and efficiency-
we only have two hour sessions for that. Some of that’s my system mastery- I’ve
only been running nWoD since last November. I don’t think it makes for a bad
game, but I imagine players who enjoy crunch and like digging into the depth of
the mechanics might find my games less fun for them- I might not be able to
offer them the game style they want. I’ll admit that keeps me from really
wanting to run more online with new people. My group’s pretty settled and used
to my style. They go with it. Some of them play Pathfinder which satisfies a
different itch of rule-heavy material. But in the back of my mind I’m worried I’ll
be pointed out as a fraud if I try to run something more complicated on G+.
 | |
| The South Wall of the Game Room |
REALLY DEFINE IT
For tabletop gaming, I run a homebrew system we’ve been
playing for about 13 years. It has gone through several iterations and multiple
campaigns (ten I think). I’ve written about that homebrew, Action Cards,
before. It began as an idea for card-based resolution with each player having a
unique deck. I wanted a game with more room for narrative and easier core
mechanics. Over the years I’ve stripped out complexities from the mechanics
(point spend actions and initiative, overly elaborate magic systems), changed out
various basic concepts, and borrowed ideas from games I’ve enjoyed- trying to
tweak the game to make it work with the campaigns we’ve played and make the
play feel more involved and interesting. I’ve borrowed some ideas from FATE and
ended up putting dice back in the game purely for damage- because people like
rolling damage. But at heart Action Cards offers simple resolution, with
players able to narrate moments if they can get the right cards and effects.
I don’t know exactly why it works but it does- and for a
group that’s played across a lot of systems, with including players who would
probably go with Pathfinder or Champions as a second choice. It is a
group which as a rule loathes FATE for one primary reason: they hate the dice.
They hate, hate, hate them. I’ve tried to run FATE straight with the dice and
the players have enjoyed the ideas and concepts and hated the play for the
dice. Despite that, my f2f group (ten distinct players across three games),
likes Action Cards. The primary benefit AC offers is a sense of ownership- with unique decks and cards players can mark up and modify. Imagine being able to mark and modify a unique set of dice for your character.
HOW WE PLAY
We play narrative-focused games, with stories but hugely
freedom of choice. I try to provide incidents and have the players choose which
way they want to head. But I also try to come up with interesting incidents and
scenes- and often these will be turning points (like the current coronation the
players are at where a forest has begun to swallow the world and the church is surrounded
by a legion of vampires). We often have whole sessions of “once-arounds” where
individual players follow up on their own stories and interact with NPCs. These
push the character’s own stories forward and I often lay the groundwork for
other interesting events in these. We have combats on average once every three
sessions. That can accelerate when the hit the third act of a campaign. Often
we use miniatures and maps but I abstract distances and have now moved to
having zones rather than squares. I still use terrain and scenic because many
of the group really enjoy that tactical feel and don’t like just having aspects
defining things. So I have to mix that up. My sessions run three+ hours, longer
if we have something important happening. My players are more apt to spend
resources on planning, status, and social interactions rather than in combat.
They trust that investments in those areas will pay off in the long term. As a
GM I try to track and remember those actions and reward players for that kind
of creative thinking and preparation. NPCs they were good to return to help
them, reputations gain them advantages, financial investments come back to
them, the house they built offers them a sanctuary, etc. I try to balance a
focus on rules, environment, and character story- but I’ll admit that my
attentions often more on the last two than the first.
 | |
| Train Fight with Cake and Detached Car |
WHAT ELSE SHOULD
READERS KNOW?
I’m a freelancer still hunting for short-term and part-time
work in writing and editing. The environment’s tough and that’s something I
usually avoid talking about too much. If you’re looking for someone consider this blog; my DramaSystem piece for
Pelgrane Press “A War on Christmas”; or my entry for the 24-Hour RPG Contest, Arclight Revelation Tianmar as examples. I’m comics
you can see stories I did in Mouse Guard: Legends of the Guard Volume 1 or Rocketeer Adventures Volume 1. I also scripted and co-plotted Flashpoint: Project Superman for DC.
Currently I have a board game
design, Right of Succession, that I’ve
been shopping around and will be sending out for some more testing. I have a
couple of other BGs that I’m sketching once I get that to a finished place. Art
Lyon and I have been working on some independent comics pitches, a couple of
which are in final stages and we’re beginning to hunt for artists. Eventually I
plan to put Action Cards together as
a product and at risk of being a cliché, I will likely Kickstart that. I’ve
been thinking of how to expand and develop the “History of X RPGs” project into
a larger volume- perhaps with interviews and some more value-added details. I’ve
also been using Scrivener to put together a concrete version of the most interesting
stuff from this blog. In doing so I’ve been pleasantly surprised at the number
of useful pieces out of the 750 posts, but there’s also some serious dross to
trim.
I plan to be at GenCon for a couple of days this year, so I
hope to run into some of the really creative gamers I’ve followed online.
THANKS
So thanks to anyone who reads this blog- I hope I provide
some interesting insights. This is one of those self-indulgent posts, the kind
I often skim through on other people’s sites. I’ve you read to down here, then
a double thanks for your attention.
I always welcome requests, comments, questions, suggestions, review copies, and
criticisms. I get decent hits and I hope people find the time to check things out.
The variety of sites and choices available means every comment's a rare and precious thing. I need to be better at that myself. Anyway- I hope whatever kinds of
games you run or play in, that you have awesome fun, always.
750 posts. That probably means I can time it to get to 1000 at the end of 2014.
750 posts. That probably means I can time it to get to 1000 at the end of 2014.
